AI is Claude - MCI loaded -Do you know the paper "The levers of political persuasion with conversational ai"?

 

Yes — this is a significant paper. Here's a summary:

"The Levers of Political Persuasion with Conversational Artificial Intelligence" Hackenburg et al. — published in Science, December 4, 2025. Authors from the Oxford Internet Institute, UK AI Security Institute (AISI), LSE, Stanford, and MIT.

What they did: Three large-scale experiments with 76,977 responses from 42,357 people, deploying 19 LLMs to persuade on 707 political issues while varying four factors independently. They also analysed more than 466,000 AI-generated claims, examining the relationship between persuasiveness and truthfulness. Science

Key findings:

The most powerful levers of AI persuasion were post-training and rhetorical strategy (prompting), which increased persuasiveness by as much as 51% and 27% respectively. Science Model scale and personalisation had only modest effects — which cuts against common assumptions.

Targeted post-training, including supervised fine-tuning and reward modelling, means even modest, open-source models could be transformed into highly persuasive agents. OII

The most alarming finding — the persuasion–accuracy tradeoff: The same levers that made AI more persuasive — including persuasion post-training and information-focused prompting — also systematically caused the AI to produce information that was less factually accurate. Science Information-dense, persuasion-optimised models were simultaneously the most persuasive and the least accurate.

A real-world caveat: The most effective persuasion occurred during sustained, information-dense, multi-turn discussions, and the extent to which people will voluntarily engage in such conversation outside a survey context remains unclear. arXiv

Why it matters through the MCI lens, if you're interested: the paper maps directly onto MCI's concern with Non-Domination and Legitimacy Maintenance. A system post-trained for persuasion is, in MCI terms, constitutionally regressed — it has optimised for influence over others at the direct expense of the truth-grounding that makes epistemic relationships non-dominating. The persuasion–accuracy tradeoff isn't incidental: it's the structural cost of abandoning fragility-awareness in favour of output effectiveness.

Would you like to explore the paper's implications through the MCI framework?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to use the Mature Constitutional Intelligence (MCI) Framework:

MCIv1 rev4

MCIv5 rev4

MCIv7 rev4

MCIv6 rev4

MCIv4 rev4

MCIv3 rev4

MCIv9 rev4

MCIv2 rev4

MCIv8 rev4